I disagreed across the board with the rep’s rep (and she kicked the lone newspaperman out of the room – First Amendment anyone?) but she at least talked to us and let us shoot angry questions at her. Sure Wolf’s not going to do anything when we complain about tax increases not being a part of the deal – he tows the Republican line like they all do (and Democrats too, lately) – but it felt good to say our piece anyway. Housemate and I were the youngest folks in the room. We talked to the newspaperman afterward, about how we’re both smart, college educated ladies who can’t get decent work and surely if the government’s in such financial trouble then the people who can most afford to should put in their share. It was their tax cuts that largely got us in this mess to begin with. Austerity’s not working for Britain so why would it work for us? I tend to agree with Krugman on all this. And to connect this in an offhanded way to the blog’s theme, I can see this “compromise” eroding already fragile environmental protections.
The anthropology of the "protest" was interesting too - on whose terms/turf were we speaking? How should one behave? On the one hand, you want to express fury, on the other you want to be polite to the reps as people and get listened to. The group tipped from one approach to the other during the meeting, getting angry one moment and asking genially about an intern's university experience the next. On the whole, I think people are too deferential to our leaders. It makes them think we don't care.
Moral of the story: talk to your elected officials – it feels good! Besides, they’re supposed to work for you.